Heythrop Journal 54 (1):42-54 (2013)
|Abstract||There are widely differing accounts of Augustine's place in the early history of the notion of conscience. While some regard his contribution as groundbreaking, others consider that he only stressed interiority more than earlier authors. Starting with a contrast with Jerome, the present article aims at clarifying Augustine's specific contribution and the place of conscience in his moral thought|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy C. Potts (ed.) (1980). Conscience in Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Arne Johan Vetlesen (2001). Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):1-33.
Peter Godman (2009). Paradoxes of Conscience in the High Middle Ages: Abelard, Heloise, and the Archpoet. Cambridge University Press.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Vasiliki Karavakou (2006). The Educational Demands of a Philosophical Theory of Moral Conscience in a Modern Democracy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:65-71.
Edward Vallance & Harald Braun (eds.) (2004). Contexts of Conscience in Early Modern Europe, 1500-1700. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads21 ( #65,382 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?