A System For Identifying Named Entities in Biomedical Text: How Results From Two Evaluations Reﬂect on Both the System and the Evaluations
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We present a maximum-entropy based system for identifying Named Entities (NEs) in biomedical abstracts and present its performance in the only two biomedical Named Entity Recognition (NER) comparative evaluations that have been held to date, namely BioCreative and Coling BioNLP. Our system obtained an exact match f-score of 83.2% in the BioCreative evaluation and 70.1% in the BioNLP evaluation. We discuss our system in detail including its rich use of local features, attention to correct boundary identiﬁcation, innovative use of external knowledge resources including parsing and web searches, and rapid adaptation to new NE sets. We also discuss in depth problems with data annotation in the evaluations which caused the ﬁnal performance to be lower than the optimal.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert J. Cramer & Stanley L. Brodsky (2007). Undue Influence or Ensuring Rights?: Attorney Presence During Forensic Psychology Evaluations. Ethics and Behavior 17 (1):51 – 60.
Arto Laitinen (2002). Strong Evaluations and Personal Identity. In Christian Kanzian & et al (eds.), Persons: An Interdisciplinary Approach. ALWS Society 127-9.
Claudio Pizzi (2007). Necessity and Relative Contingency. Studia Logica 85 (3):395 - 410.
Christopher D. Manning, An Effective Two-Stage Model for Exploiting Non-Local Dependencies in Named Entity Recognition.
Alec Grierson, David Moore & Tangming Yuan (2011). Assessing Debate Strategies Via Computational Agents. Argument and Computation 1 (3):215-248.
Torben Spaak (2009). Karl Olivecrona on Judicial Law-Making. Ratio Juris 22 (4):483-498.
Jessica M. Wilson (2013). Nonlinearity and Metaphysical Emergence. In Stephen Mumford & Matthew Tugby (eds.), Metaphysics and Science.
Joseph M. Whitmeyer (2004). Past and Future Applications of Jasso's Justice Theory. Sociological Theory 22 (3):432-444.
Annette Rid David Wendler (2011). A Framework for Risk-Benefit Evaluations in Biomedical Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.
Sean R. Valentine & Terri L. Rittenburg (2004). Spanish and American Business Professionals' Ethical Evaluations in Global Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):1-14.
Rachel Cohon (2010). Hume's Moral Sentiments As Motives. Hume Studies 36 (2):193-213.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads1 ( #747,055 of 1,790,186 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,186 )
How can I increase my downloads?