Cosmic Distances
Phronesis 45 (3):175-204 (2000)
| Abstract | In the "Doxographi Graeci" the preferred short heading of Aët. 2.31 (Greek text below, p. 28) is 'On Distances', though ps.Plutarch has a long heading. This chapter is about the distances of the sun and moon from each other and from the earth (lemmas 1 to 3, in both ps.Plutarch and Stobaeus), and of the real or apparent shape of the heaven relative to its distance from the earth (lemmas 4 and 5, Stobaeus only). Parallels from Ioann. Lydus and Theodoret for what is in ps.Plutarch are given by Diels in apparatu. To the best of my knowledge it has not been noticed that a version of ps.Plutarch's text is preserved in a scholium on the "Almagest", which constitutes our earliest evidence for the text. The correctness of Diels' reconstruction is questionable. Though certainty, naturally, is beyond our reach it is quite possible that these two sets of lemmas represent two distinct Aëtian (or proto-Aëtian) chapters. These may have been coalesced by Stobaeus (or Aëtius), while ps.Plutarch abridged the second (or the two final lemmas) away. These considerations necessitate an inquiry into the parallels that are available, including material from an introduction to Aratus. The vexing question of short versus long(er) chapter headings is also relevant in this context. Furthermore, the contrasting views regarding cosmic distances are not only a feature of the Placita literature with a distant origin in Aristotle, but also, apparently, of the commentary literature on Plato's "Timaeus". Arguably in a passage in Plutarch's "De facie" these two traditions intersect. Finally, a case can be made out for Eudemus not Theophrastus as an intermediary source of Presocratic astronomical data in the Placita | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJaap Mansfeld (2000). Cosmic Distances. Phronesis 45 (3):175-204.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius Ii 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1-18.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius Ii 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1-18.
Radek Chlup (2000). Plutarch's Dualism and the Delphic Cult. Phronesis 45 (2):138-158.
Radek Chlup (2000). Plutarch's Dualism and the Delphic Cult. Phronesis 45 (2):138-158.
Frederick E. Brenk (1998). Relighting the Souls: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion, and Philosophy, and in the New Testament Background. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Christoph Helmig (2008). Plutarch of Chaeronea and Porphyry on Transmigration – Who is the Author of Stobaeus I 445.14–448.3 (W.-H.)? The Classical Quarterly 58 (01).
Dimitrios Dentsoras (2011). Plutarch's Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):372-373.
M. Cary (1929). The Greek Questions of Plutarch The Greek Questions of Plutarch. With a Nevv Translation and a Commentary. By W. R. Halliday. Pp. 233. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928. 15s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):28-29.
M. Cary (1928). Plutarch and Greek Biography Plutarch Und Die Griechische Biographic. By Count Uxkull-Gyllenband. Pp. 120. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1927. 7s. 3d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):30-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-31Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
