Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):687-688 (2000)
|Abstract||This commentary focuses on the implications of practical reasoning research for the view of rationality in Stanovich & West's target article. Practical reasoning does not correlate with intelligence or other reasoning tasks. Explanation in decision making terms raises the issue of dilemmas, making it hard to specify the correct norm, when an action can satisfy or conflict with two equally justifiable goals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Isaac Levi (1986). Hard Choices: Decision Making Under Unresolved Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
Philippa Foot (2002). Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nader Saiedi (1987). A Critique of Habermas' Theory of Practical Rationality. Studies in East European Thought 33 (3):251-265.
Thomas Kelly (2003). Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
David Moshman (2004). From Inference to Reasoning: The Construction of Rationality. Thinking and Reasoning 10 (2):221 – 239.
John Lemos (2006). Morality, Self-Interest, and Two Kinds of Prudential Practical Rationality. Philosophia 34 (1):85-93.
David Weitzner & James Darroch (2010). The Limits of Strategic Rationality: Ethics, Enterprise Risk Management, and Governance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (3):361 - 372.
Hugh J. McCann (1990). Practical Rationality. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:57-77.
Patricia S. Greenspan (2004). Practical Reasoning and Emotion. In The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,830 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?