David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):65 – 78 (1991)
Abstract It is sometimes thought that Absolute Idealism was undermined by its inability to deal with science. Through a critical discussion of F. H. Bradley's philosophy of science, this idea is challenged. His views on science are divided into a positive and a negative part, and it is argued that, although he found the scientific world view to be essentially false, he was nonetheless able to develop a sympathetic and intelligent philosophy of science. This was basically pragmatic and instrumental in tone, and gave to science a large measure of autonomy from philosophy. His doctrine is connected with certain contemporary ideas in the philosophy of science
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
F. Bradley (1914). Essays on Truth and Reality. Clarendon Press.
F. H. Bradley (1935/1970). Collected Essays. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
F. H. Bradley (1963). The Principles of Logic. [London]Oxford University Press.
Stewart Candlish (1989). The Truth About F. H. Bradley. Mind 98 (391):331-348.
C. F. Delaney (1971). Bradley on the Nature of Science. Idealistic Studies 1 (3):201-218.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harvey Siegel (1985). What is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science? Philosophy of Science 52 (4):517-537.
Mario Bunge (1972). Book Review:Mach's Philosophy of Science J. Bradley. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 39 (2):266-.
R. Bradley (1999). Review. Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. R Backhouse. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):316-318.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
R. G. A. Dolby (1996). Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World. Cambridge University Press.
Dachun Liu & Yongmou Liu (2009). A Reflection on the Alternative Philosophy of Science. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):576-588.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Bradley E. Wilson (1998). Sociobiology, Sex, and Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 29 (1):201-210.
Bradley E. Wilson (1996). Book Review:Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science Alexander Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 63 (1):139-.
W. J. Mander (1994). An Introduction to Bradley's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #126,925 of 1,692,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,675 of 1,692,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?