Fixed- versus Variable-domain Interpretations of Tarski’s Account of Logical Consequence

Philosophy Compass 5 (9):745-759 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I describe and evaluate the debate that surrounds the proper interpretation of Tarski’s account of logical consequence given in his classic 1936 article ‘On the concept of logical consequence’. In the late 1980s Etchemendy argued that the familiar model theoretic account of logical consequence is not to be found in Tarski’s original article. Whereas the contemporary account of logical consequence is a variable‐domain conception – in that it calls for a reinterpretation of the domain of variation of the quantifiers when evaluating logical consequence –, no such reinterpretation is found in Tarski’s original account, which was rather based on a ‘fixed‐domain’ conception. Etchemendy’s claims have sparked a debate on Tarski’s conception of logical consequence with important contributions by, among others, Bach, Bays, Corcoran, Gómez‐Torrente, Mancosu, Ray, Sagüillo, and Sher.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tarski on Variable Domains.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:47-52.
Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski.Greg Ray - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):617 - 677.
Etchemendy, Tarski, and Logical Consequence.Jared Bates - 1999 - Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):47-54.
Ray on Tarski on logical consequence.William H. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence.Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.
What is Tarski's common concept of consequence?Ignacio Jané - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.
On a fallacy attributed to Tarski.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):227-234.
Bolzano's deducibility and tarski's logical consequence.Paul B. Thompson - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):11-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
85 (#181,210)

6 months
7 (#174,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paolo Mancosu
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Why Is a Valid Inference a Good Inference?Sinan Dogramaci - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):61-96.
Logical Indefinites.Jack Woods - 2014 - Logique Et Analyse -- Special Issue Edited by Julien Murzi and Massimiliano Carrara 227: 277-307.
Carnap’s Early Semantics.Georg Schiemer - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):487-522.
Logic in the 1930s: Type Theory and Model Theory.Georg Schiemer & Erich H. Reck - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):433-472.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic, semantics, metamathematics.Alfred Tarski - 1956 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by John Corcoran & J. H. Woodger.
The concept of logical consequence.John Etchemendy - 1990 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Introduction to logic and to the methodology of deductive sciences.Alfred Tarski - 1946 - New York: Dover Publications. Edited by Jan Tarski.

View all 21 references / Add more references