1 introduction
| Abstract | give just two examples, the Paradox of the Stone is racy’. (1987, p. 106) said to show the impossibility of omnipotence, while an array of arguments try to show the incom-. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJ. C. Beall (2003). Possibilities and Paradox: An Introduction to Modal and Many-Valued Logic. Oxford University Press.
N. G. Wilson (1988). Fernando Gascó, Antonio Ramírez de Verger: Elio Aristides, Discursos I (Introductión, Traducción y Notas). (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 106.) Pp. 430. Madrid: Gredos, 1987. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):406-.
Erik J. Wielenberg (2001). The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited. Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-04-19Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
