Inequality: Mind the gap! A reply to Smilansky's paradox of the baseline

Analysis 65 (3):265–368 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00564.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The connection between responsibility and desert: The crucial distinction.Saul Smilansky - 1996 - Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline: A reply to Manor.Saul Smilansky - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):333–337.
The paradox of beneficial retirement: A reply to Lenman.Saul Smilansky - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):348–351.
Never mind the gap: The explanatory gap as an artifact of naive philosophical argument.Marcel Scheele - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):333-342.
Status, lotteries and inequality¤.Gary Becker - unknown
The explanatory gap is not an illusion: A reply to Michael Tye.Brie Gertler - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):689-694.
My Way and Life’s Highway: Replies to Steward, Smilansky, and Perry. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer - 2008 - The Journal of Ethics 12 (2):167 - 189.
Discussion. The connection between responsibility and desert: The crucial distinction.S. Smilansky - 1996 - Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline.Saul Smilansky - 2003 - Analysis 63 (2):146–151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
83 (#198,631)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Interesting is the “Boring Problem” for Luck Egalitarianism?Gerald Lang - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (3):698-722.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references