David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This introduction has two functions. First, it apprises readers of some of the basic data, terminology, and formalisms used in contemporary discussions of the design argument while also giving a sense of the argument's history. Other pieces in this anthology – particularly those of Elliott Sober, John Leslie, Paul Davies, and Michael Ruse – cover some of the same ground. Second, it gives readers some idea of what the various contributors will say and why their contributions are important for understanding the design argument.1 Though I will raise my own concerns at various points, I will (so far as I can) leave the philosophical and scientific heavy lifting to the distinguished contributors.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Branden Fitelson (1999). How Not to Detect Design. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):472 - 488.
Jan Narveson (2003). God by Design? In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge 80--88.
Neil A. Manson (2009). The Fine-Tuning Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Michael Ruse (2003). Modern Biologists and the Argument From Design. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge
John Leslie (2003). The Meaning of Design. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge
Paul Davies (2003). The Appearance of Design in Physics and Cosmology. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge
Neil A. Manson (2000). Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument. Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Elliott Sober (1999). How Not to Detect Design. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):472 - 488.
Elliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #184,535 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?