Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):200-213 (2012)
|Abstract||‘Spin’ is a pejorative term for a ubiquitous form of communication. Spin is viewed by many as deceptive, and by others as bending or twisting the truth. But spin need not be deceptive and the metaphors are less than clear. The aim here is to clarify what spin is: spin is identified as a form of selective claim-making, where the process of selection is governed by an intention to bring about promotional perlocutionary effects. The process of selection may pertain to aspects of some situation or phenomenon; or to the lexis used in making the claims. Not all selective promotional communication is spin. Spin involves a distinctive kind of dissociation between the speaker's first-order interpretation and the constructed interpretation or claim offered to others. With these clarifications in place the discussion turns to the complex connections between spin, truthfulness and deception. Aspect-selective spin can be truthful, and it need not be deceptive in its intentions or effects, but may risk deceiving audiences. Lexical spin is less readily truthful, and both forms of spin prudentially require a distinctive kind of concealment of the speaker's intentions. The account developed here does not address normative questions about whether, or how, spin might be wrong, but aims to provide a clear and adequate account of spin as a basis for addressing normative questions about spin|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Katherine Bedard (1998). Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 114 (3):405-444.
Huping Hu & Maoxin Wu, Spin as Primordial Self-Referential Process Driving Quantum Mechanics, Spacetime Dynamics and Consciousness.
Steven French (2000). Putting a New Spin on Particle Identity. In R. Hilborn & G. Tino (eds.), Spin Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations.
Thomas Breuer (2003). Another No‐Go Theorem for Hidden Variable Models of Inaccurate Spin 1 Measurements. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
Thomas Breuer (2003). Another No-Go Theorem for Hidden Variable Models of Inaccurate Spin 1 Measurements. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1368-1379.
E. S. Paul, C. Fox, A. J. Boston, H. J. Chantler, C. J. Chiara, R. M. Clark, M. Cromaz, M. Descovich, P. Fallon, D. B. Fossan, A. A. Hecht, T. Koike, I. Y. Lee, A. O. Macchiavelli, P. J. Nolan, K. Starosta, R. Wadsworth, I. Ragnarsson & Bob Wadsworth, High-Spin Yrast States in the Gamma-Soft Nuclei Pr-135 and Ce-134.
Tilman Sauer (2007). An Einstein Manuscript on the EPR Paradox for Spin Observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (4):879-887.
Ruth Kastner (2005). Why the Afshar Experiment Does Not Refute Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (4):649-658.
Keith M. Parsons (2010). Rational Episodes: Logic for the Intermittently Reasonable. Prometheus Books.
Vesselin Noninski, A Quantum Mechanical Measurement Leading to Simultaneous Spin-Up and Spin-Down State of a Single Electron.
Jonathan Bain (2013). CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories. Erkenntnis 78 (4):797-821.
Added to index2012-06-26
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?