- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Mutual Scorn Within the Abortion Debate: Some Parallels With Race Relations
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):295-311 (2015)
Abstract
By emphasizing the parallels between both racial vilification and the vilification that takes place when we discuss abortion in our society, I hope to provide a new perspective on the way the United States converses about this divisive issue. This perspective, in turn, can help us see how we can move forward from the stagnate polemics that have permeated the abortion debate in the United States for the past 40 yearsAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
After Feticide: Coping with Late-Term Abortion in Israel, Western Europe, and the United States.Michael L. Gross - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):449-462.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. [REVIEW]Elliott Louis Bedford - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
The Relevance of Aristotle’s Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate.James M. Jacobs - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132.
Interests in Abortion: a New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate.S. McLean - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):132.
Is There Sufficient Common Ground to Resolve the Abortion Debate?Peter Seipel - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (3):517-531.
The place for individual conscience.Frances Kissling - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):24-27.
Stumbling on status: Abortion, stem cells, and faulty reasoning. [REVIEW]Karen Lebacqz - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):75-82.
Two stalemates in the philosophical debate about abortion and why they cannot be resolved using analogical arguments.Chris Kaposy - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-05
Downloads
29 (#538,668)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
2015-02-05
Downloads
29 (#538,668)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
“Can a Company be Bitchy?” Corporate (and Political and Scientific) Social Responsibility.Leigh E. Rich & Michael A. Ashby - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):159-169.
References found in this work
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo