David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2005)
Naturalistic Hermeneutics proposes the position of the unity of the scientific method and defends it against the claim to autonomy of the human sciences. Mantzavinos shows how materials that are 'meaningful', more specifically human actions and texts, can be adequately dealt with by the hypothetico-deductive method, the standard method used in the natural sciences. The hermeneutic method is not an alternative method aimed at the understanding and the interpretation of human actions and texts, but it is the same as the hypothetico-deductive method applied to meaningful materials. The central thesis advocated by Mantzavinos is, thus, that there is no fundamental methodological difference between natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Advanced students and professionals across philosophy, social and political theory, and the humanities will find this a compelling and controversial book.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$3.25 new (97% off) $5.38 used (95% off) $104.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD241.M285 2005|
|ISBN(s)||0521848121 9780521848121 1139444875 9781139444873|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hannes Leitgeb (2011). Logic in General Philosophy of Science: Old Things and New Things. Synthese 179 (2):339 - 350.
Similar books and articles
C. Mantzavinos (2012). Explanations of Meaningful Actions. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):224-238.
William M. Thompson (1992). Word & Spirit, Hermeneutics & Transcendental Method. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):185-212.
James Franklin (1984). Natural Sciences as Textual Interpretation: The Hermeneutics of the Natural Sign. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (4):509-520.
Georgia Warnke (1985). Hermeneneutics and the Social Sciences: A Gadamerian Critique of Rorty. Inquiry 28 (1-4):339 – 357.
Josef Bleicher (1980/1993). Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. Routledge.
A. P. (1998). The Scope of Hermeneutics in Natural Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):273-298.
M. Wayne Cooper (1994). Is Medicine Hermeneutics All the Way Down? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Bradford Mccall (2009). C. Mantzavinos: Naturalistic hermeneutics. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (2):273-274.
Kurt Mueller-Vollmer (ed.) (1985). The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition From the Enlightenment to the Present. Continuum.
Richard S. Briggs (2009). Understanding Hermeneutics. By Lawrence K. Schmidt Naturalistic Hermeneutics. By C. Mantzavinos Hermeneutics at the Crossroads. Edited by Kevin J. Vanhoozer, James K.A. Smith & Bruce Ellis Benson Issues in Interpretation Theory (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 49). Edited by Pol Vandevelde. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (1):117-118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #126,305 of 1,413,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?