Parménide et Héraclite avaient-ils une théorie de la perception?

Phronesis 44 (4):326-346 (1999)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685289960464629
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
D. O'Brien (1990). Héraclite et l'unité des opposés. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 95 (2):147 - 171.
Caroline San Martin (2008). Personnage, pensée, perception. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 12 (1):16-28.
Gunther Coppens (2004). Spinoza et Boxel. Une histoire de fantomes. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1 (1):59-72.
Sandra Laugier (2004). Acte de langage ou pragmatique ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):279-303.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #200,376 of 1,724,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,164 of 1,724,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.