Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207 (1999)
|Abstract||A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field’s mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions abouthuman-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Ben A. Minteer, Elizabeth A. Corley & Robert E. Manning (2004). Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156.
Laura Westra (2009). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Charles Y. Deknatel (1980). Questions About Environmental Ethics? Toward a Research Agenda with a Focus on Public Policy. Environmental Ethics 2 (4):353-362.
Jason Scott Robert (2000). Wild Ontology: Elaborating Environmental Pragmatism. Ethics and the Environment 5 (2):191 - 209.
Lars Samuelsson (2010). Environmental Pragmatism and Environmental Philosophy. Environmental Ethics 32 (4):405-415.
Robert Frodeman (2004). Environmental Philosophy and the Shaping of Public Policy. Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):6-12.
Ben A. Minteer (ed.) (2009). Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Eric Katz (1999). A Pragmatic Reconsideration of Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):377-390.
Paul B. Thompson (1986). Uncertainty Arguments in Environmental Issues. Environmental Ethics 8 (1):59-75.
Robert Traer (2012). Doing Environmental Ethics. Westview Press.
Andrew Light (2009). Does a Public Environmental Philosophy Need Convergence Hypothesis? In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Midori Kagawa-Fox (2012). The Ethics of Japan's Global Environmental Policy: The Conflict Between Principles and Practice. Routledge.
Peter Lucas (2002). Environmental Ethics: Between Inconsequential Philosophy and Unphilosophical Consequentialism. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):353-369.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,788 )
How can I increase my downloads?