Simplicity and Properties: A Reply to Morris

Religious Studies 22 (3/4):343 - 353 (1986)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500018369
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Anders Kraal (2011). Logic and Divine Simplicity. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):282-294.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
T. Ryan Byerly (2012). Why Persons Cannot Be Properties. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):67-83.
Bruce Langtry (2011). Swinburne on the Simplicity of Theism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):409 - 426.
Harold W. Noonan (1984). Methodological Solipsism: A Reply to Morris. Philosophical Studies 48 (September):285-290.
Thomas V. Morris (1988). Dependence and Divine Simplicity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):161 - 174.
Peter Forrest (2011). In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #254,083 of 1,902,847 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #128,380 of 1,902,847 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.