To catch a heretic

Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):479-495 (2003)
Abstract Augustine devoted two treatises to the topic of lying, De Mendacio and Contra Mendacium ad Consentium. The treatises raise interesting questions about whatlying is while defending the thesis that all lies are sinful. The first part of this essay offers an interpretation of Augustine’s attempts at definition. The second part exanlines his argunlents for the sinfulness of lying used to trap heretics and for the more general thesis that all lying is sinful
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,631
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Christopher Tollefsen (2012). Augustine, Aquinas, and the Absolute Norm Against Lying. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):111-134.
    Don Fallis (2009). What Is Lying? Journal of Philosophy 106 (1):29-56.
    Don Fallis (2010). Lying and Deception. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (11).
    Alexander R. Pruss (2010). Lies and Dishonest Endorsements. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:213-222.
    Roy Sorensen (2012). Lying with Conditionals. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):820-832.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    4 ( #178,434 of 548,951 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,511 of 548,951 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums