The limitations and costs of Lycan's 'simple' argument
Analysis 61 (4):319-323 (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Consciousness Metaphysics Mind Representation Lycan, W | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam G. Lycan, Representational Theories of Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reinaldo Elugardo (1981). Machine Functionalism and the New Lilliputian Argument. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (March):256-61.
Thomas W. Polger & Owen J. Flanagan (2001). A Decade of Teleofunctionalism: Lycan's Consciousness and Consciousness and Experience. Minds and Machines 11 (1):113-126.
William G. Lycan (1987). Consciousness. MIT Press.
Robert Stalnaker (1993). What is the Representation Theory of Thinking?: A Comment on William G. Lycan. Mind and Language 8 (3):423-430.
Robert W. Lurz (2001). Begging the Question: A Reply to Lycan. Analysis 61 (272):313-318.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #115,524 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
