David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Grammatical theory has long wrestled with the fact that causative constructions exhibit properties of both single words and complex phrases. However, as Paul Kiparsky has observed, the distribution of such properties of causatives is not arbitrary: ‘construal’ phenomena such as honoriﬁcation, anaphor and pronominal binding, and quantiﬁer ‘ﬂoating’ typically behave as they would if causatives were syntactically complex, embedding constructions; whereas case marking, agreement and word order phenomena all point to the analysis of causatives as single lexical items.1 Although an analysis of causatives in terms of complex syntactic structures has frequently been adopted in an attempt to simplify the mapping to semantic structure, we believe that motivating syntactic structure based on perceived semantics is questionable because in general a syntax/semantics homomorphism cannot be maintained without vitiating syntactic theory (Miller 1991). Instead, we sketch a strictly lexical theory of Japanese causatives that deals with the evidence oﬀered for a complex phrasal analysis. Such an analysis makes the phonology, morphology and syntax parallel, while a mismatch occurs with the semantics. The conclusions we will reach are given in (1)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Maria Bittner (1999). Concealed Causatives. Natural Language Semantics 7 (1):1-78.
Yael Ravin (1990). Lexical Semantics Without Thematic Roles. Oxford University Press.
Rui P. Chaves (2008). Linearization-Based Word-Part Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):261-307.
Johan Rooryck (1988). Restrictions on Dative Cliticization in French Causatives. Journal of Semantics 6 (1):41-55.
Liliana Albertazzi (2002). Kinetic Structures and Causatives. Axiomathes 13 (1):17-37.
Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore (2001). Why Compositionality Won't Go Away: Reflections on Horwich's 'Deflationary' Theory. Ratio 14 (4):350–368.
J. E. Miller (1985). Semantics and Syntax: Parallels and Connections. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Bassac, Bruno Mery & Christian Retoré (2010). Towards a Type-Theoretical Account of Lexical Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (2):229-245.
József Andor (2003). On the Role of Frame-Based Knowledge in Lexical Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):667-668.
J. Pustejovsky & Bran Boguraev (eds.) (1997). Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford University Press.
Farrell Ackerman & John Moore (1999). Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Dimensions of Causee Encodings. Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (1):1-44.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads3 ( #220,511 of 1,005,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,005,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?