David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
There is empirical evidence that many patients want information about treatment options even though they do not want to take a full part in decision‐making about treatment. Such evidence may have considerable ethical implications but is methodologically problematic. It is argued here that, in fact, it is not at all surprising that patients’ informational interests should be separable from their interests in decision‐making. A number of different reasons for wanting information are offered, some to do with the content of information; some with the process, others with the fact or occasion of informing. This philosophical clarification leads to some suggestions for further empirical study
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Irina Medau, Ralf J. Jox & Stella Reiter-Theil (2013). How Psychotherapists Handle Treatment Errors – an Ethical Analysis. BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):50.
Similar books and articles
Adrienne M. Martin (2007). Tales Publicly Allowed: Competence, Capacity, and Religious Belief. Hastings Center Report 37 (1):33-40.
Arthur R. Derse (1999). Making Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Patients with Dementia. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Ruth McCorkle (1980). An Ethical Dilemma: Information Control in Cancer Care. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (3):148-158.
Gil Siegal, Richard J. Bonnie & Paul S. Appelbaum (2012). Personalized Disclosure by Information-on-Demand: Attending to Patients' Needs in the Informed Consent Process. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (2):359-367.
Peter H. Schwartz (2009). Disclosure and Rationality: Comparative Risk Information and Decision-Making About Prevention. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):199-213.
Mark Strasser (1986). Mill and the Right to Remain Uninformed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (3):265-278.
David Shaw (2010). An Extra Reason to Roll the Dice: Balancing Harm, Benefit and Autonomy in 'Futile' Cases. Clinical Ethics 5 (217):219.
Bernadette Richards & John Coggon (2013). Informing Patients and Making Decisions. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):139-143.
Margaret P. Battin (1985). Non-Patient Decision-Making in Medicine: The Eclipse of Altruism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):19-44.
Linus Broström, The Substituted Judgment Standard. Studies on the Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.
Robert M. Veatch (1997). Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):391-401.
N. C. Manson (2010). Why Do Patients Want Information If Not to Take Part in Decision Making? Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):834-837.
A. Kessel & Michael J. Crawford (1997). Openness with Patients: A Categorical Imperative to Correct an Imbalance. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):297-304.
Martin Jones & Robert Sugden (2001). Positive Confirmation Bias in the Acquisition of Information. Theory and Decision 50 (1):59-99.
Added to index2011-01-29
Total downloads31 ( #128,514 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #68,019 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?