Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 78 (3):410-420 (2011)
|Abstract||Cosmologists often use certain global properties to exclude "physically unreasonable" cosmological models from serious consideration. But, on what grounds should these properties be regarded as "physically unreasonable" if we cannot rule out, even with a robust type of inductive reasoning, the possibility of the properties obtaining in our own universe?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jody Azzouni (1997). Applied Mathematics, Existential Commitment and the Quine-Putnam Indispensability Thesis. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3):193-209.
Josep E. Corbí & Josep L. Prades (2000). Mental Contents, Tracking Counterfactuals, and Implementing Mechanisms. In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 9: Philosophy of Mind. Charlottesville: Philosophy Doc Ctr.
Michael Strevens (2012). The Explanatory Role of Irreducible Properties. Noûs 46 (4):754-780.
Michael Strevens (2008). Physically Contingent Laws and Counterfactual Support. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (8):1-20.
Mathias Frisch (2004). Laws and Initial Conditions. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):696-706.
David Slutsky (2001). Causally Inefficacious Moral Properties. Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):595-610.
John Byron Manchak (forthcoming). Is Spacetime Hole-Free? General Relativity and Gravitation.
Thomas Benda (2008). A Formal Construction of the Spacetime Manifold. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5):441 - 478.
Added to index2009-03-12
Total downloads16 ( #81,907 of 740,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?