Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-24 (1994)
|Abstract||Bertrand's random-chord paradox purports to illustrate the inconsistency of the principle of indifference when applied to problems in which the number of possible cases is infinite. This paper shows that Bertrand's original problem is vaguely posed, but demonstrates that clearly stated variations lead to different, but theoretically and empirically self-consistent solutions. The resolution of the paradox lies in appreciating how different geometric entities, represented by uniformly distributed random variables, give rise to respectively different nonuniform distributions of random chords, and hence to different probabilities. The principle of indifference appears consistently applicable to infinite sets provided that problems can be formulated unambiguously|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ronald N. Giere (1970). An Orthodox Statistical Resolution of the Paradox of Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):354-362.
Raymond S. Nickerson & Susan F. Butler (2011). Keep or Trade? An Experimental Study of the Exchange Paradox. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):365-394.
Sorin Bangu (2010). On Bertrand's Paradox. Analysis 70 (1):30-35.
Louis Marinoff (1996). How Braess' Paradox Solves Newcomb's Problem: Not! International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):217 – 237.
Amos Nathan (1984). The Fallacy of Intrinsic Distributions. Philosophy of Science 51 (4):677-684.
Darrell P. Rowbottom & Nicholas Shackel (2010). Bangu's Random Thoughts on Bertrand's Paradox. Analysis 70 (4):689-692.
Nicholas Shackel (2007). Bertrand's Paradox and the Principle of Indifference. Philosophy of Science 74 (2):150-175.
Jeffrey M. Mikkelson (2004). Dissolving the Wine/Water Paradox. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):137-145.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,763 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?