David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 82 (1):97 - 125 (1990)
An interpretation of quantum mechanics that rejects hidden variables has to say something about the way measurement can be understood as a transformation on states of individual systems, and that leads to the core of the interpretive problems posed by Luders' projection rule: What, if any, is its physical content? In this paper I explore one suggestion which is implicit in usual interpretations of the rule and show that this view does not stand on solid ground. In the process, important aspects of the role played by the projection postulate in the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics will be clarified. It will be shown in particular that serious objections can be raised against the (often implicit) view that identifies the physical relation of compatibility preserved by Luders' rule with the relation of simultaneous measurability.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jeffrey Bub (1976). The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):161-175.
John von Neumann & R. T. Beyer (1958). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (32):343-347.
Allen Stairs (1982). Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 49 (3):481-.
Henry Margenau & James L. Park (1973). The Physics and the Semantics of Quantum Measurement. Foundations of Physics 3 (1):19-28.
Gary M. Hardegree (1977). Relative Compatibility in Conventional Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):495-510.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Esfeld (2002). Externalism About Content: Its Social and Its Physical Roots. Filosoficky Casopis 50:387-400.
Federico Laudisa, Relational Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paul Teller (1983). The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.
W. Michael Dickson (1995). Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.
Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino (2008). A Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (2):380-443.
Sergio Martinez (1988). Minimal Disturbance in Quantum Logic. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:83 - 88.
Geoffrey Hellman (1981). Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate. Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Allen Stairs (1982). Quantum Logic and the Luders Rule. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436.
Sergio Martinez (1991). Lüders's Rule as a Description of Individual State Transformations. Philosophy of Science 58 (3):359-376.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #77,232 of 1,724,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #72,191 of 1,724,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?