David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Teaching Philosophy 20 (1):19-34 (1997)
With reference to the “Campus Wars” debates, this paper argues that within the classroom, professional responsibilities justify professors advocating for personal commitments which are pertinent to their discipline. In fact, given a professor’s commitment to pursuing truth in the classroom, this advocacy is both inevitable and desirable. The question to ask, then, is what separates appropriate from inappropriate forms of influence on students. The author draws on the American Association of University Professors’ Statement of Professional Ethics to explore ethical tensions that professors face in the classroom and to motivate further discussion about these tensions as they pertain specifically to ethics teachers. After arguing that the chief tension an ethics professor must navigate is that which arises between the pursuit of truth and respect for student autonomy, the author moves to a consideration of various pedagogical strategies for negotiating this tension. Though each strategy discussed holds advantages and disadvantages, the author maintains that the question of appropriate advocacy is important and complex, and that it calls for further study
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jay Odenbaugh (2003). Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology. Environmental Values 12 (1):55 - 69.
Hagop Sarkissian (2010). The Darker Side of Daoist Primitivism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (2):312-329.
Sven Diekmann & Martin Peterson (2013). The Role of Non-Epistemic Values in Engineering Models. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):207-218.
Jagdish Chander & K. B. (1980). Human Values, Moral Values, and Spiritual Values: A Book on Divine Values for the Coming Golden Age. Prajapita Brahma Kumaris Ishwariya Vishwa-Vidyalaya.
Heather Douglas (2014). The Value of Cognitive Values. Philosophy of Science 80 (5):796-806.
Ann Lawrence & Peter Lawrence (2009). Values Congruence and Organisational Commitment: P—O Fit in Higher Education Institutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):297-314.
I. Sluiter & Ralph Mark Rosen (eds.) (2008). Kakos: Badness and Anti-Value in Classical Antiquity. Brill.
Jean Hillier (1999). What Values? Whose Values? Philosophy and Geography 2 (2):179 – 199.
Nicole Klenk (2009). The Ethics of “Following Nature” in Forestry. Environmental Ethics 31 (1):67-84.
Robin Attfield (2005). Biocentric Consequentialism and Value-Pluralism: A Response to Alan Carter. Utilitas 17 (1):85-92.
Michael Henderson (2003). Values at Work: The Invisible Threads Between People, Performance and Profit. Harperbusiness.
Linda Bomstad (1995). Advocating Procedural Neutrality. Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
Linda Bornstad (1995). Advocating Procedural Neutrality. Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?