Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America [Book Review]
Hypatia 19 (3):216-221 (2004)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rosamund Scott (2005). Prenatal Testing, Reproductive Autonomy, and Disability Interests. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):65-82.
Steven Edwards (2002). Review of Prenatal Testing & Disability Rights, Edited by Adrienne Asch and Erik Parens. [REVIEW] Nursing Philosophy 3 (1):73–74.
Lainie Friedman Ross (2002). Review of Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Edited by Adrienne Asch and Erik Parens. [REVIEW] Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (4):624-626.
Rebecca Bennett (2001). Antenatal Genetic Testing and the Right to Remain in Ignorance. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):461-471.
Laura Purdy (2001). Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Social Theory and Practice 27 (4):681-687.
Bethany Spielman (1995). Book Review: Women and Prenatal Testing. [REVIEW] Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):199-201.
George Munchus (1989). Testing as a Selection Tool: Another Old and Sticky Managerial Human Rights Issue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
James Lindemann Nelson (2000). Prenatal Diagnosis, Personal Identity, and Disability. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):213-228.
Rebecca Dresser (2009). Prenatal Testing and Disability: A Truce in the Culture Wars? Hastings Center Report 39 (3):7-8.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads4 ( #188,845 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?