Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:219-220 (2010)
|Abstract||This article is a commentary on Machery (2009) Doing without Concepts. Concepts are mental symbols that have semantic structure and processing structure. This approach (1) allows for different disciplines to converge on a common subject matter; (2) it promotes theoretical unification; and (3) it accommodates the varied processes that preoccupy Machery. It also avoids problems that go with his eliminativism, including the explanation of how fundamentally different types of concepts can be co-referential.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edouard Machery (2010). Précis of Doing Without Concepts. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):602-611.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Margolis Laurence (2010). Concepts and Theoretical Unification. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:219-220.
Edouard Machery (2009). Doing Without Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Barbara C. Malt (2010). Why We Should Do Without Concepts. Mind and Language 25 (5):622-633.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (1999). Concepts and Cognitive Science. In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT.
Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2002). Unification and Explanation. Synthese 131 (1):145 - 154.
John Jung Park (2013). Prototypes, Exemplars, and Theoretical & Applied Ethics. Neuroethics 6 (2):237-247.
D. H. Mellor (1966). Inexactness and Explanation. Philosophy of Science 33 (4):345-359.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2009). The Plurality of Concepts. Synthese 169 (1):145 - 173.
Thomas J. Fararo (1989). The Spirit of Unification in Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory 7 (2):175-190.
Jonah N. Schupbach (2005). On a Bayesian Analysis of the Virtue of Unification. Philosophy of Science 72 (4):594-607.
Added to index2011-06-06
Total downloads16 ( #75,663 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #13,107 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?