Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 37 (3):431-436 (2009)
|Abstract||The manuscript includes comments on Michael Jacovides’s paper, “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” The paper and comments were delivered at the conference “Meaning and Modern Empiricism” held at Virginia Tech in April 2008. I consider Jacovides’s treatment of Berkeley’s Resemblance Argument and his interpretation of the Master Argument. In particular, I distinguish several ways of understanding the disagreement between Jacovides and Kenneth Winkler over the right way to read the Master Argument.|
|Keywords||Berkeley Conceivability Master argument Resemblance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Giovanni Battista Grandi (2009). Comments on Daniel E. Flage's “Berkeley's Contingent Necessities”. Philosophia 37 (3):373-378.
Michael Jacovides (2009). How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive. Philosophia 37 (3):415-429.
Michael Jacovides (forthcoming). Locke on Perception. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A companion to Locke. Blackwell.
Daniele Bertini (2007). Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley's Master Argument. Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
Sven Rosenkranz (2006). Priest and the Bishop. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):335–347.
Michael Jacovides (2010). Hume's Vicious Regress. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 5:247-97.
Melissa Frankel (2009). Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos' Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):409-413.
Walter R. Ott (2004). The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Michael Jacovides (2009). Remarks on Smalligan Marusic's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):437-439.
Added to index2009-07-25
Total downloads23 ( #60,278 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?