Conceptions of self/no‐self and modes of connection comparative soteriological structures in classical chinese thought
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):293-331 (2005)
This essay examines the ways that the terms "self and "no-self can illuminate the views of classical Chinese thinkers, particularly Confucians such as Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi, and the Daoist thinker Zhuangzi. In particular, the use of the term "no-self" to describe Zhuangzi's position is defended. The concepts of self and no-self are analyzed in relation to other terms within the thinkers' "concept clusters" - specifically temporality, nature, and social roles - and suggestions are given for constructing typologies that sort out the range of meanings of self and no-self based on the characteristics of the relations among terms within the concept clus- ters. The essay focuses on the way that the Confucians and Zhuangzi use concepts of self and no-self, respectively, as soteriological strategies that aim at making connections with larger systems or wholes, and it concludes that different connections are emphasized by the Confucians and Zhuangzi precisely because the various connections are made possible and sustained by different conceptions of self, temporality, nature, and social roles
|Keywords||temporality no‐self self nature Confucian ethics Zhuangzi|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Douglas Allen & Ashok Kumar Malhotra (eds.) (1997). Culture and Self: Philosophical and Religious Perspectives, East and West. Westview Press.
Roger T. Ames, Wimal Dissanayake & Thomas P. Kasulis (1995). Self as Person in Asian Theory and Practice. Philosophy East and West 45 (4):602-604.
Mark Allen Berkson (2000). Death and the Self in Ancient Chinese Thought: A Comparative Perspective. Dissertation, Stanford University
Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins & Steven Lukes (eds.) (1985). The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge University Press.
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Elizabeth M. Bucar, Grace Y. Kao & Irene Oh (2010). Sexing Comparative Ethics: Bringing Forth Feminist and Gendered Perspectives. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):654-659.
John Kelsay (2012). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics: An Update. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):583-602.
Similar books and articles
Edward Slingerland (2004). Conceptions of the Self in the Zhuangzi: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis and Comparative Thought. Philosophy East and West 54 (3):322-342.
Edward Gilman Slingerland (2004). Conceptions of the Self in the Zhuangzi: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis and Comparative Thought. Philosophy East and West 54 (3):322 - 342.
Franklin Perkins (2005). Following Nature with Mengzi or Zhuangzi. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):327-340.
Edward G. Slingerland (2004). Conceptions of the Self in The. Philosophy East and West 54 (3).
Jiang Tao (2011). Two Notions of Freedom in Classical Chinese Thought: The Concept of Hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (4):463-486.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Eske Møllgaard (2005). Zhuangzi's Notion of Transcendental Life. Asian Philosophy 15 (1):1 – 18.
Eske Møllgaard (2005). Zhuangzi's Notion of Transcendental Life. Asian Philosophy 15 (1):1-18.
Ronnie Littlejohn (2010). Kongzi in the Zhuangzi". In Victor Mair (ed.), Experimental Essays on Zhuangzi.
Jiyuan Yu (2008). Soul and Self: Comparing Chinese Philosophy and Greek Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):604-618.
Eske Møllgaard (2007). An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in Zhuangzi. Routledge.
Aaron B. Creller (2011). Zhuangzi and Early Chinese Philosophy: Vagueness, Transformation and Paradox (Review). Philosophy East and West 61 (2):385-388.
Alan Levinovitz (2012). The Zhuangzi and You 遊: Defining an Ideal Without Contradiction. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (4):479-496.
Guorong Yang (2008). Names and Words in the Philosophy of Zhuangzi. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):1-26.
Daniel M. Johnson (2012). Social Morality and Social Misfits: Confucius, Hegel, and the Attack of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):365-374.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads21 ( #125,645 of 1,699,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?