|Abstract||Whilst Hegel's influence upon the Frankfurt School's reconstruction of Marx has not gone unnoticed, this influence has never really been adequately theorised. In particular, the question of how the Frankfurt School understood the relation between Hegel's method and Marx's materialism has received very little systematic attention. The present study is a response to this situation: it presents the Frankfurt Marxist tradition as a significant although by no means uncritical contribution to the theory of historical materialism. Moreover, that contribution is shown to derive from some of the central concepts of Hegel's philosophy. Thus in opposition to those commentators, Marxists and non-Marxists alike, who have tended to view Frankfurt Marxism as an exercise in eclectic revisionism, I argue that the work of Horkheimer and his colleagues constitutes an attempt to restate and defend, on the basis of an immanent critique of Hegel's idealism, the fundamental principles of Marx's historical materialism. Accordingly, the central chapters of this thesis are devoted to a close examination of the way in which members of the Frankfurt School, building on the work of Lukács and Korsch, sought to appropriate Hegel's subject-object dialectic on behalf of materialism. In the course of this investigation the following themes come to prominence: the relation between Hegel's social philosophy and a critical theory of society; Horkheimer's project of multi-disciplinary materialism; the methodological significance of the category of totality; materialism as the preponderance of the object; the possibility and nature of a Freud-Marx synthesis; the concept of a critical as opposed to a traditional scientific theory of society. Taken together these themes constitute the basic problematic of the Frankfurt Marxist tradition. The intention of this study is to demonstrate the importance of that problematic for the further development of the materialist theory of history and society|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Kevin Anderson (1993). On Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory: A Critical Appreciation of Herbert Marcuse's Reason and Revolution, Fifty Years Later. Sociological Theory 11 (3):243-267.
Jeffery Nicholas (2012). Reason, Tradition, and the Good: Macintyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Andrew Feenberg (1981/1986). Lukács, Marx, and the Sources of Critical Theory. Oxford University Press.
Stanley Moore (1971). Marx and the Origin of Dialectical Materialism1. Inquiry 14 (1-4):420-429.
David-Hillel Ruben (1979). Marxism and Materialism: A Study in Marxist Theory of Knowledge. Humanities Press.
Dick Howard (2000). Political Theory, Critical Theory, and the Place of the Frankfurt School. Critical Horizons 1 (2):271-280.
Sean Sayers (1984). Marxism and the Dialectical Method: A Critique of G.A. Cohen. Radical Philosophy (36):4-13.
Nina Belmonte (2002). Evolving Negativity: From Hegel to Derrida. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):18-58.
Eric S. Nelson (2011). Revisiting the Dialectic of Environment: Nature as Ideology and Ethics in Adorno and the Frankfurt School. Telos 2011 (155):105-126.
Peter Button (2007). Negativity and Dialectical Materialism: Zhang Shiying's Reading of Hegel's Dialectical Logic. Philosophy East and West 57 (1):63-82.
Kevin Anderson & Russell Rockwell (eds.) (2012). The Dunayevskaya-Marcuse-Fromm Correspondence, 1954-1978: Dialogues on Hegel, Marx, and Critical Theory. Lexington Books.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-09-02
Total downloads1 ( #291,386 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?