David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 83 (3):337 - 355 (1990)
Much speculation on the sources of Duhem's historical interests fails to account for the major shifts in these interests: neither his belief in the continuous development of physics nor his Catholicism, when his Church was encouraging the study of generally Aristotelian scholastic thought, led to any interest in mediaeval science before 1904. Equally, his own claim that he was merely testing his views on the nature of physical theory is easily squared only with earlier work with no trace of mediaeval science. Behind this discontinuity lies a major crisis. Though not a positivist, Duhem had based all his work on assumptions acceptable to positivists. One of these, the sterility of the Middle Ages, was refuted by his chance discovery of evidence of genuine mediaeval science in the autumn of 1903, but that left the doctrine of scholastic sterility intact.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jacques Hadamard (2008/1954). An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Read Books.
F. A. Hayek (1952). The Counter-Revolution of Science; Studies on the Use of Reason. Journal of Philosophy 49 (17):560-565.
R. N. D. Martin (1976). The Genesis of a Mediaeval Historian: Pierre Duhem and the Origins of Statics. Annals of Science 33 (2):119-129.
Stanley L. Jaki & Pierre Duhem (1987). Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (3):406-408.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert S. Westman (1990). The Duhemian Historiographical Project. Synthese 83 (2):261-272.
Thomas Lepeltier (2005). Was Pierre Duhem a Precursor of Postmodernism? Angelaki 10 (2):27 – 38.
Similar books and articles
David J. Stump (2007). Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1):149-159.
Roger Ariew & Peter Barker (1986). Duhem on Maxwell: A Case-Study in the Interrelations of History of Science and Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:145 - 156.
Paul Needham (1996). Macroscopic Objects: An Exercise in Duhemian Ontology. Philosophy of Science 63 (2):205-224.
Philip L. Quinn (1990). Duhem in Different Contexts: Comments on Brenner and Martin. Synthese 83 (3):357 - 362.
Robert J. Deltete (2008). Man of Science, Man of Faith: Pierre Duhem's "Physique de Croyant". Zygon 43 (3):627-637.
Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Anastasios A. Brenner (1990). Holism a Century Ago: The Elaboration of Duhem's Thesis. Synthese 83 (3):325 - 335.
P. Needham (1998). Duhem's Physicalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):33-62.
Gregory Wheeler (2000). Error Statistics and Duhem's Problem. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #170,826 of 1,796,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #97,246 of 1,796,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?