Does the world need U.s. Farmers even if americans don't?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4) (2008)
| Abstract | We consider the implications of trends in the number of U.S. farmers and food imports on the question of what role U.S. farmers have in an increasingly global agrifood system. Our discussion stems from the argument some scholars have made that American consumers can import their food more cheaply from other countries than it can produce it. We consider the distinction between U.S. farmers and agriculture and the effect of the U.S. food footprint on developing nations to argue there might be an important role for U.S. farmers, even if it appears Americans don’t need them. For instance, we may need to protect U.S. farmland and, by implication, U.S. farmers, for future food security needs both domestic and international. We also explore the role of U.S. farmers by considering the question of whether food is a privilege or a right. Although Americans seem to accept that food is a privilege, many scholars and commentators argue that, at least on a global scale, food is a right, particularly for the world’s poor and hungry. If this is the case, then U.S. farmers might have a role in meeting the associated obligation to ensure that the poor of the world have enough food to eat. We look at the consequences of determining that food is a right versus a privilege and the implications of that decision for agricultural subsidies as well as U.S. agriculture and nutrition policies. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNicholas P. Guehlstorf (2008). Understanding the Scope of Farmer Perceptions of Risk: Considering Farmer Opinions on the Use of Genetically Modified (Gm) Crops as a Stakeholder Voice in Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6).
David C. Hall, Simeon Ehui & Christopher Delgado (2004). The Livestock Revolution, Food Safety, and Small-Scale Farmers: Why They Matter to Us All. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (4-5).
Mary K. Hendrickson & Harvey S. James (2005). The Ethics of Constrained Choice: How the Industrialization of Agriculture Impacts Farming and Farmer Behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3).
Stefan Mann & Miriam Gairing (2012). “Loyals” and “Optimizers”: Shedding Light on the Decision for or Against Organic Agriculture Among Swiss Farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):365-376.
Harvey S. James & Mary K. Hendrickson (forthcoming). Are Farmers of the Middle Distinctively “Good Stewards”? Evidence From the Missouri Farm Poll, 2006. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Jeffrey R. Follett (2009). Choosing a Food Future: Differentiating Among Alternative Food Options. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1).
Philippe Deuffic & Jacqueline Candau (2006). Farming and Landscape Management: How French Farmers Are Coping with the Ecologization of Their Activities. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (6).
Siti Musa (2009). The Relationship Between Food Security and Trade Liberalization. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:191-208.
Mary K. Hendrickson, Harvey S. James & William D. Heffernan (2008). Does the World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don't? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-05-04Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
