Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James

London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marchetti offers a revisionist account of James's contribution to moral thought in the light of his pragmatic conception of philosophical activity. He sketches a composite picture of a Jamesian approach to ethics revolving around the key notion and practice of a therapeutic critique of one's ordinary moral convictions and style of moral reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatism, realism, and religion.Michael R. Slater - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
William James's conception of truth.Bertrand Russell - 1992 - In William James & Doris Olin (eds.), William James: Pragmatism, in Focus. Routledge.
William James’s Pragmatism.Heidi White - 2010 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2 (1):89-99.
Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking.William James - 2019 - Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press. Edited by Eric C. Sheffield.
In Defence of Stakeholder Pragmatism.Tommy Jensen & Johan Sandström - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):225-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-31

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

William James.Russell Goodman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant’s Universalism versus Pragmatism.Hemmo Laiho - 2019 - In Krzysztof Skowroński & Sami Pihlström (eds.), Pragmatist Kant—Pragmatism, Kant, and Kantianism in the Twenty-first Century. Helsinki, Finland: pp. 60-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references