David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
A defense of amorality as both philosophically justified and practicably livable. While in synch with their underlying aim of grounding human existence in a naturalistic metaphysics, this book takes both the new atheism and the mainstream of modern ethical philosophy to task for maintaining a complacent embrace of morality. It advocates instead replacing the language of morality with a language of desire. The book begins with an analysis of what morality is and then argues that the concept is not instantiated in reality. Following this, the question of belief in morality is addressed: How would human life be affected if we accepted that morality does not exist? The book argues that at the very least, a moralist would have little to complain about in an amoral world, and at best we might hope for a world that was more to our liking overall. An extended look at the human encounter with nonhuman animals serves as an illustration of amorality’s potential to make both theoretical and practical headway in resolving heretofore intractable ethical problems.
|Keywords||Ethics Animal ethics Meta-ethics Moral abolitionism Amorality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$65.00 used (54% off) $107.07 new (27% off) $145.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1031.M3153 2012|
|ISBN(s)||9780415635561 041563556X 9781138845107 9780203093078|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Cowie (2015). Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):115-130.
Christopher Cowie (forthcoming). Revisionist Responses to the Amoralism Objection: A Reply to Julia Markovits. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-13.
Richard Joyce (2013). Irrealism and the Genealogy of Morals. Ratio 26 (4):351-372.
James Lenman (2013). Ethics Without Errors. Ratio 26 (4):391-409.
Christopher Cowie (2015). Conservatism in Metaethics: A Case Study. Metaphilosophy 46 (4-5):605-619.
Similar books and articles
Sherwin Klein (1985). Two Views of Business Ethics: A Popular Philosophical Approach and a Value Based Interdisciplinary One. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):71 - 79.
Joel Marks (2011). Atheism, Amorality, and Animals. The New York Times.
Joel Marks (2010). An Amoral Manifesto Part I. Philosophy Now (80):30-33.
Joel Marks (2010). An Amoral Manifesto Part II. Philosophy Now (81):23-26.
Archie B. Carroll (2001). Models of Management Morality for the New Millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):365-371.
Joel Marks (2004). “There's No Room in the Worksheet” and Other Fallacies About Professional Ethics in the Curriculum. Teaching Ethics 4 (2):79-90.
Myrodes Konstantinides (1984). Amorality Among Plato's Contemporaries. N.Y. Classical Studies Press.
Czesław Porębski (2003). Bocheński on Morality and Ethics. Studies in East European Thought 55 (4):387-400.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1915). The Basis of Morality. Dover Publications.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Hilary Sommerlad (2010). Some Reflections on the Amorality of the Market: Correspondent's Report From the United Kingdom. Legal Ethics 13 (1):93-96.
Erik Wielenberg (2005). Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-07-25
Total downloads32 ( #124,857 of 1,906,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #129,894 of 1,906,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?