Flexibility of scientific truth
Philosophy of Science 1 (4):486-487 (1934)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHoward Sankey (2001). Scientific Realism: An Elaboration and a Defence. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98 (98):35-54.
J. H. Goldstein (1962). Scientific Truth and the Scientific Method. In Thomas J. J. Altizer (ed.), Truth, Myth, and Symbol. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Prentice-Hall.
Michael Bishop (1999). Semantic Flexibility in Scientific Practice: A Study of Newton's Optics. Philosophy and Rhetoric 32 (3):210 - 232.
Susan Haack (2008). Of Truth, in Science and in Law. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2).
Russell Pryba (2010). Flexible Realism, Flexibility, and Holism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):41-46.
Edward Mackinnon (1982). The Truth of Scientific Claims. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.
F. Zwicky (1934). On the Principle of the Flexibility of Scientific Truth. Philosophy of Science 1 (3):353-358.
Charles Hartshorne (1935). Flexibility of Scientific Truth. Philosophy of Science 2 (2):255-256.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,239 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
