Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341 (2004)
|Abstract||This paper sets out two semantics for the relevant logic R based on Dunn's four-valued semantics for first-degree entailments. Unlike Routley's semantics for weak relevant logics, they do not use two ternary accessibility relations. Unlike Restall's semantics, they capture all of R. But there is a catch. Both of the present semantics are neighbourhood semantics, that is, they include sets of propositions in the specification of their frames|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Greg Restall (1994). Subintuitionistic Logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Greg Restall & Tony Roy (2009). On Permutation in Simplified Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):333 - 341.
J. Michael Dunn (2000). Partiality and its Dual. Studia Logica 66 (1):5-40.
A. S. Karpenko (1983). Factor Semantics Forn-Valued Logics. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):179 - 185.
Greg Restall (1993). Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
Edwin D. Mares (1995). A Star-Free Semantics for R. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.
Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann (1995). A Relevant Theory of Conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
Greg Restall (1995). Four-Valued Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (2):139 - 160.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,020 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?