Hope, fantasy, and commitment1 Adrienne M. Martin firstname.lastname@example.org.Edu
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The standard foil for recent theories of hope is the belief-desire analysis advocated by Hobbes, Day, Downie, and others. According to this analysis, to hope for S is no more and no less than to desire S while believing S is possible but not certain. Opponents of the belief-desire analysis argue that it fails to capture one or another distinctive feature or function of hope: that hope helps one resist the temptation to despair;2 that hope engages the sophisticated capacities of human agency, such as planning;3 or that hope involves the imagination in ways desire need not.4 Here, I focus on the role of imagination in hope, and discuss its implications for hope’s relation to practical commitment or end-setting.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ariel Meirav (2009). The Nature of Hope. Ratio 22 (2):216-233.
Adrienne M. Martin (2011). Hopes and Dreams. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):148 - 173.
Adrienne Martin (2008). Hope and Exploitation. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):49-55.
Jayne M. Waterworth (2003). A Philosophical Analysis of Hope. Palgrave Macmillan.
Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi (2010). Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility. Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Nicholas H. Smith (2008). Analysing Hope. Critical Horizons 9 (1):5-23.
Luc Bovens (1999). The Value of Hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):667-681.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?