In defense of bad infinity
| Abstract | Hegel’s very first acknowledged publication was, among other things, an attack on Fichte.1 In 1801, Hegel was still laboring in almost complete obscurity, while Fichte was an international sensation, though already somewhat past the peak of his meteoric career. In the 1801 Differenzschrift, Hegel cut his teeth by criticizing Fichte’s already widely-criticized Wissenschaftslehre, and by demonstrating that Schelling’s philosophical system was not simply to be equated with it. Fichte himself never bothered to respond to Hegel’s criticisms; indeed he never publicly acknowledged their existence. This was not because he was unconcerned with criticisms of his views; quite the contrary. But at the time he had bigger fish to fry. He responded to Jacobi’s criticisms, and to Schelling’s; he replied in great detail to critical questions raised by Reinhold, and with vituperative intensity to objections raised by skeptics and purportedly loyal Kantians. But Hegel’s Differenzschrift was left without a Fichtean rebuttal. This is a pity, both because of the missed opportunity to illuminate by controversy central issues at stake in the post-Kantian period, but also because it made it easier for Hegel simply to reiterate his youthful criticism as if it were the last word. And reiterate it he did: in one form or another Hegel’s early criticisms of Fichte reappear at every subsequent stage of his career: in the Phenomenology, in the Science of Logic, in the Encyclopaedia, as the final chapter in Hegel’s History of Philosophy, and in countless other minor works and documents from the Nachlass and correspondence. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesSimon Lumsden (2003). Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience. Topoi 22 (1).
James Clarke (2011). Hegel's Critique of Fichte in the 1802/3 Essay on Natural Right. Inquiry 54 (3):207 - 225.
Andrew Haas (1997). The Bacchanalian Revel: Hegel and Deconstruction. Man and World 30 (2):217-226.
Gary J. Percesepe (1984). Telos in Hegel's Differenz des Ficthe'schen Und Schelling'schen Systems der Philosophie. Philosophy Research Archives 10:393-439.
Andrew Chitty (1996). On Hegel, the Subject, and Political Justification. Res Publica 2 (2).
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1977). The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy. State University of New York Press.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #72,013 of 556,772 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,772 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
