Is something wrong with the tree of life?

Bioessays 18 (7):523-527 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent study(1) of sequence data from many different proteins has suggested that contemporary prokaryotes and eukaryotes may have shared a common ancestor as recently as 2 billion years ago (the molecular clock). Strong evidence from the geological record, however, indicates that oxygen‐producing microorganisms, perhaps similar to modern cyanobacteria, existed 3.5 billion years ago. The fossil evidence, therefore, suggests that any common ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes must have existed at least 1.5 billion years earlier than suggested by the molecular clock evidence. The discrepancy between molecular and geological evidence for the age of modern cells is considered here, as are aspects of gene descent in the tree of life that might help to account for it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trashing life’s tree.L. R. Franklin-Hall - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):689-709.
Species, Genes, and the Tree of Life.Joel D. Velasco - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):599-619.
The Route from the Tree of Knowledge to the Tree of Life.Emanuel Gruengard - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 48:33-41.
Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property.Spencer Unger - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645.
Cellularity of Pseudo-Tree Algebras.Jennifer Brown - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):353-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When integration fails: Prokaryote phylogeny and the tree of life.Maureen A. O’Malley - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4a):551-562.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references