David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 319-320 (2009)
Kant's theoretical philosophy is often read as a response to skeptical challenges raised by his predecessors. Yet Kant himself explicitly discusses skepticism in relatively few places in his published work, so Michael Forster's focused examination of Kant's relation to skepticism is a useful addition to the literature. Forster sets out to distinguish different types of skepticism to which Kant might be responding, determine what responses Kant offers, and evaluate the strength of those responses.Perhaps the most valuable part of the book is the opening chapters, where Forster distinguishes three kinds of skepticism about metaphysics , and argues that it is a mistake to see Cartesian, veil of perception skepticism as a central target of Kant's. Though this point has been made before , insufficient attention to it has continued to result in misplaced criticisms of Kant's project, and Forster's forceful reminder is certainly welcome.The other two types of skepticism, Forster argues, did play crucial roles in the development of Kant's metaphysical views, with each at some point rousing Kant from a self-described "dogmatic slumber." Forster claims that the 1766
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Adrian Bardon (2006). The Aristotelian Prescription: Skepticism, Retortion, and Transcendental Arguments. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):263-276.
Diego E. Machuca (2010). Review of M. Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 30 (3):186-8.
Robert Stern (2008). Kant's Response to Skepticism. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press 265.
Paul Guyer (2009). Kant and Skepticism. Philosophical Review 118 (3):384-389.
John Christian Laursen (1992). The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume, and Kant. E.J. Brill.
Michael N. Forster (2009). Kant and Skepticism. Princeton University Press.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Andrew Chignell & Colin McLear (2010). Three Skeptics and the Critique: Review of Michael Forster's Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244.
Abraham Anderson (1998). On the Practical Foundation of Kant's Response to Epistemic Skepticism. Kant-Studien 89 (2):145-166.
Linton Wang & Oliver Tai (2010). Skeptical Conclusions. Erkenntnis 72 (2):177 - 204.
Added to index2009-04-11
Total downloads32 ( #134,851 of 1,938,824 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,264 of 1,938,824 )
How can I increase my downloads?