David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophers' Imprint 10 (8):1-21 (2010)
I argue that Kant's Critique of Pure Reason offers a positive metaphysical account of the thinking self. Previous interpreters have overlooked this account, I believe, because they have held that any metaphysical view of the self would be incompatible with both Kant's insistence on the limitations of cognition and with his project in the Paralogisms. Closer examination, however, shows that neither of those aspects of the Critique precludes a metaphysical account of the self, and that other aspects (namely, the structure of Kant's overall project and the commitments of his claims in the Transcendental Deduction) require such an account. Drawing on a principle of 'effect-relative composition,' I argue that Kant's self is neither an activity, a form, nor a representation, but instead an individual constituted by the thing or things that bring about the unity of a course of experience.
|Keywords||Kant self metaphysics Critique of Pure Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Symington (2011). Metaphysics Renewed. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):285-301.
Harold W. Brogan (2004). Kant's Retrieval of Leibniz. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):271-284.
Immanuel Kant (1970). The Essential Kant. New York,New American Library.
Lara Ostaric (2009). Kant's Account of Nature's Systematicity and the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Inquiry 52 (2):155 – 178.
James Hebbeler (2012). The Principles of the First Critique. Review of Metaphysics 65 (3):555-579.
Avery Goldman (2002). The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
Houston Smit (1999). The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):203–223.
Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2004). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant's Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
Brian Chance (2014). Kant and the Discipline of Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):87-110.
Added to index2010-08-25
Total downloads112 ( #28,771 of 1,780,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #73,977 of 1,780,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?