Graduate studies at Western
History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):327-341 (2008)
|Abstract||To understand pre-Fregean theories of judgment and proposition, such as those found in Locke and the Port-Royal logic, it is important to distinguish between propositions in the modern sense and propositions in the pre-Fregean sense. By making this distinction it becomes clear that these pre-Fregean theories cannot be meant to solve the propositional attitude problem. Notwithstanding this fact, Locke and Arnauld are able to make a distinction between asserted and unasserted propositions (in their sense). The way Locke makes this distinction turns out to be very different from the way it is made by Arnauld|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Manfred Müller (1991). Eine Widerlegung der Redundanztheorie der Wahrheit. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (1):101-110.
Antoine Arnauld (1996). Logic, or, the Art of Thinking: Containing, Besides Common Rules, Several New Observations Appropriate for Forming Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Nadler (2008). Arnauld's God. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 517-538.
David Owen (2003). Locke and Hume on Belief, Judgment and Assent. Topoi 22 (1):15-28.
Martha Brandt Bolton (1992). The Epistemological Status of Ideas: Locke Compared to Arnauld. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (4):409 - 424.
Maria van der Schaar (2012). Locke on Judgement and Religious Toleration. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):41 - 68.
John J. Conley (2009). Adoration and Annihilation: The Convent Philosophy of Port-Royal. University of Notre Dame Press.
Peter W. Hanks (2007). How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell's Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. Synthese 154 (1):121 - 146.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads22 ( #62,693 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?