Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication

Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):191-215 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of mimesis is not very often used in the contemporary semiotic dialogue. This article introduces several views on this concept, and on the basis of these, mimesis is comprehended as a phenomenon of communication. By highlighting different semantic dimensions of the concept, mimesis is seen as being composed of phases of communication and as such, it is connected with imitation, representation, iconicity and other semiotic concepts.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

14064243

DOI

10.5840/signsystems200331168

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mimesis on the move: Theodor W. Adorno's concept of imitation.Karla L. Schultz - 1990 - New York: P. Lang.
Semiotics of mediation.Peeter Torop - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):547-555.
Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Transforming Mimesis.Daniel L. Tate - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):185-208.
Sign and Meaning: A Semiotic Approach to Communication.Codruţa Porcar - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):20-29.
The movement of mimesis: Heidegger's 'origin of the work of art' in relation to Adorno and Lyotard.Tom Huhn - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):45-69.
Mimesis in Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory.Bed P. Paudyal - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
'States of the common and the unique': An introduction to a general functional communication theory.Fee-Alexandra Haase - manuscript
Towards a semiotic definition of trash.Riste Keskpaik - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):313-323.
The chicken and the Orphean egg: On the function of meaning and the meaning of function.Claus Emmeche - 2002 - Σημιοτκή-Sign Systems Studies 1 (1):15-32.
Triadic bodily mimesis is the difference.Jordan Zlatev, Tomas Persson & Peter Gärdenfors - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):720-721.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
74 (#218,358)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Semiotic interpretations of biological mimicry.Timo Maran - 2007 - Semiotica 2007 (167):223-248.
From mimicry to mime by way of mimesis.Göran Sonesson - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1-4):18-65.
Re-semblance and re-evolution.Karel Kleisner - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1-4):378-390.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references