Marriage, equality and subsidizing families in liberal public justification: Is there a right to polygamy?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This essay argues that the four most plausible arguments compatible with public reason for an outright legal ban on all forms of polygamy are unvictorious. My purpose is not to survey exhaustively the empirical literature on contemporary forms of polygamy, but to tease out the types of arguments political liberals would have to insist on, and precisely how strongly, in order for a general prohibition against polygamy to be justified. The most common objection to polygamy is on grounds of gender equality, more specifically, female equality. But advancing this argument forcefully often involves neglecting the tendency of political liberalism (whatever name it goes by in contemporary, complex, multicultural societies) to tolerate a certain amount of inegalitarianism in private, within the bounds of robust and meaningful freedoms of choice and exit. Properly understood, polygamy involves no inherent statement about the essential inferiority of women, and certainly not more than many other existing practices and institutions (including many expressions of the main monotheistic religions) which political liberals regard as tolerable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martha M. Ertman, 'They Ain't Whites; They're Mormons': An Illustrated History of Polygamy as Race Treason.
Keith Sealing, Polygamists Out of the Closet: Statutory Prohibitions Against Polygamy Are Unconstitutional Under the Free Exercise Clause as Currently Interpreted.
Andrew F. March, Is There a Right to Polygamy and Incest? Should a Liberal State Replace "Marriage" with "Registered Domestic Partnerships"?
Jon Mahoney (2007). Liberalism and the Polygamy Question. Social Philosophy Today 23:161-174.
Thom Brooks (2009). The Problem with Polygamy. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):109-122.
Andrew F. March, Marriage, Sex and Future Persons in Liberal Public Justification: Is There a Right to Incest?
Margaret Denike (2010). The Racialization of White Man's Polygamy. Hypatia 25 (4):852-874.
Thom Brooks (2009). The Problem with Polygamy. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):109-22.
Andrew F. March (2011). Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):246-272.
Added to index2009-02-22
Total downloads56 ( #78,200 of 1,911,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?