David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):125-126 (2011)
Sharon Lloyd's new book on Hobbes is one of the most significant in the last twenty-five years. She presents an original thesis about the foundation of Hobbes's moral philosophy, namely, that his basic moral principle is what she calls the "reciprocity theorem": "From our common definition of man as rational, Hobbes argues that we won't count a person as rational unless he can formulate and is willing to offer, at least post hoc, what he regards as justifying reasons for his conduct " . Three features of this explanation should be highlighted. The first is that she appreciates the role of definition in Hobbes's scientific moral philosophy; scientific propositions are theorems deduced from definitions. The second is that rationality is an important component of these deductions. The third, and the crucial one for her book, is that moral reasoning is essentially first-person reasoning. More needs to be said about the second and third features. I begin with the third
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
S. A. Lloyd (2009). Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Martinich (2010). Reason and Reciprocity in Hobbes's Political Philosophy: On Sharon Lloyd's: Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):158-169.
Lloyd (2010). The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: A Reply to Critics. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):180-187.
Michael Cuffaro (2011). On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory. History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
Perez Zagorin (2009). Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Helen Thornton (2005). State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings. University of Rochester Press.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Thomas Hobbes (1994). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part Ii, De Corpore Politico ; with Three Lives. Oxford University Press.
A. P. Martinich (2005). Hobbes. Routledge.
Matthew Noah Smith (2010). Review of S. A. Lloyd, Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (12).
D. Dyzenhaus (2001). Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law. Law and Philosophy 20 (5):461-498.
Rosamond Rhodes (2010). Taking Hobbes at His Word: Comments on Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes by S.A. Lloyd. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):170-179.
Stephen Finn (2001). Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes. Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
James J. Hamilton (2012). Pyrrhonism in the Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):217-247.
Timothy Fuller (1990). Compatibilities on the Idea of Law in Thomas Aquinas and Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 3 (1):112-134.
Added to index2010-12-23
Total downloads28 ( #148,048 of 1,934,670 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,272 of 1,934,670 )
How can I increase my downloads?