Modeling the Metaphysics of the Incarnation

Philosophy and Theology 20 (1-2):99 - 128 (2008)
What metaphysics can plausibly back up the claim that God became incarnate? In this essay we investigate the main kinds of models of incarnation that have been historically proposed. We highlight the philosophical assumptions in each model, and on this basis offer novel ways of grouping them as metaphysical rather than doctrinal positions. We examine strengths and weaknesses of the models, and argue that ’composition models’ offer the most promising way forward to account for the pivotal Christian belief that, in Christ, true divinity and true humanity meet in a genuine union
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtheol2008201/25
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,660
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jonathan Hill (2012). Aquinas and the Unity of Christ: A Defence of Compositionalism. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):117-135.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

20 ( #205,588 of 1,938,824 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #459,264 of 1,938,824 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.