Newton's experimentum crucis vs. Goethe's series of experiments: Implications for the underdetermination thesis
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In the seventeenth century, Newton published his famous experimentum crucis, in which he claimed that light is heterogeneous and is composed of (colored) rays with different refrangibilities. Experiments, especially a crucial experiment, were important for justifying Newton’s theory of light, and eventually his theory of color. Goethe conducted a series of experiments on the nature of color, especially in contradistinction to Newton, and he defended his research with a methodological principle formulated in “Der Versuch als Vermittler.” Goethe’s principle included a series of experiments and resultant higher empirical evidence as mediator between the objective (natural phenomena) and the subjective (theory or hypothesis). Although the notion of experimentum crucis became popular among scientists, even until today, in reconstructing experimental research and for justifying theories, especially for rhetorical purposes, I propose that Newton’s justification of his theory of light and color is best reconstructed in terms of Goethe’s methodological principle. Finally, Goethe’s principle has important consequences for the contemporary philosophical underdetermination thesis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Myles W. Jackson (2008). Putting the Subject Back Into Color: Accessibility in Goethe's Zur Farbenlehre. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 378-391.
Steffen Ducheyne, Testing Universal Gravitation in the Laboratory, or the Significance of Research on the Mean Density of the Earth and Big G, 1798-1898: Changing Pursuits and Long-Term Methodological-Experimental Continuity. [REVIEW]
James A. Marcum (2007). Experimental Series and the Justification of Temin's DNA Provirus Hypothesis. Synthese 154 (2):259 - 292.
William L. Reese (1961). The "Experimentum Crucis" in Locke's Doctrine of Abstraction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (4):490-500.
Tamás Demeter & Gábor Á Zemplén (2010). Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis. The Monist 93 (4):640-656.
Robert J. Richards, Nature is the Poetry of Mind, or How Schelling Solved Goethe's Kantian Problems.
John Gage (2008). Signs of Disharmony: Newton's Opticks and the Artists. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 360-377.
Hjalmar Hegge (1972). Theory of Science in the Light of Goethe's Science of Nature. Inquiry 15 (1-4):363 – 386.
Ronald Laymon (1978). Newton's Experimentum Crucis and the Logic of Idealization and Theory Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (1):51-77.
James A. Marcum (2009). The Nature of Light and Color: Goethe's “der Versuch AlS Vermittler” Versus Newton's Experimentum Crucis. Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 457-481.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #126,655 of 1,790,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #325,851 of 1,790,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?