On an argument against pacifism

Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):437 - 442 (1974)
Abstract
In this paper a recent argument by jan narveson against pacifism is evaluated. It is shown that narveson fails to refute pacifism as he has defined it; it is also shown that even if narveson's argument is sound, It fails to refute what might be called "antiwar pacifism," the view that war is morally wrong
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,788
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

37 ( #45,620 of 1,099,039 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,039 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.