David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Disputatio 2 (26):19-37 (2006)
This paper discusses and criticizes Segal’s 1989 argument against singular object-dependent thoughts. His argument aims at showing that object-dependent thoughts are explanatorily redundant. My criticism of Segal’s argument has two parts. First, I appeal to common anti-individualist arguments to the effect that Segal’s type of argument only succeeds in establishing that object-dependent thoughts are explanatorily redundant for those aspects of subjects’ behaviour that do not require reference to external objects. Secondly, Segal’s view on singular thoughts is at odds with his view on the semantics of proper names, which favours the singularity and object-dependency of the truth-conditions of sentences in which they occur. In particular, his views are at odds with a position he holds, that truth-conditional semantics can adequately account for all aspects of speakers’ linguistic competence in the use of proper names.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Hofweber (2005). Supervenience and Object-Dependent Properties. Journal of Philosophy 102 (1):5-32.
Max F. Adams, R. Stecker & G. Fuller (1999). Object Dependent Thoughts, Perspectival Thoughts, and Psychological Generalization. Dialectica 53 (1):47–59.
P. Noonan (2004). Against Absence-Dependent Thoughts. Analysis 64 (1):92-93.
Robert A. Stecker, Max F. Adams & Gary Fuller (1999). Object Dependent Thoughts, Perspectival Thoughts, and Psychological Generalization. Dialectica 53 (1):47-59.
Michael Glanzberg (2008). Quantification and Contributing Objects to Thoughts. Noûs 42 (1):207 - 231.
Tim Crane (2011). The Singularity of Singular Thought. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):21-43.
Jody Azzouni (2011). Singular Thoughts (Objects-Directed Thoughts). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):45-61.
Harold W. Noonan (1993). Object-Dependent Thoughts: A Case of Superficial Necessity but Deep Contingency? In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press
Joshua Armstrong & Jason Stanley (2011). Singular Thoughts and Singular Propositions. Philosophical Studies 154 (2):205 - 222.
Sean Crawford (1998). In Defence of Object-Dependent Thoughts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):201-210.
Added to index2009-02-10
Total downloads300 ( #7,515 of 1,911,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)77 ( #6,258 of 1,911,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?