On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-Theo-Logy in Cartesian Thought
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (1999)
Does Descartes belong to metaphysics? What do we mean when we say "metaphysics"? These questions form the point of departure for Jean-Luc Marion's groundbreaking study of Cartesian thought. Analyses of Descartes' notion of the ego and his idea of God show that if Descartes represents the fullest example of metaphysics, he no less transgresses its limits. Writing as philosopher and historian of philosophy, Marion uses Heidegger's concept of metaphysics to interpret the Cartesian corpus--an interpretation strangely omitted from Heidegger's own history of philosophy. This interpretation complicates and deepens the Heideggerian concept of metaphysics, a concept that has dominated twentieth-century philosophy. Examinations of Descartes' predecessors (Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, and Suarez) and his successors (Leibniz, Spinoza, and Hegel) clarify the meaning of the Cartesian revolution in philosophy. Expertly translated by Jeffrey Kosky, this work will appeal to historians of philosophy, students of religion, and anyone interested in the genealogy of contemporary thought and its contradictions.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$40.00 used (57% off) $88.10 new (5% off) $92.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B1878.M5.M3713 1999|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joeri Schrijvers (2010). Marion, Levinas, and Heidegger on the Question Concerning Ontotheology. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):207-239.
Lilian Alweiss (2009). The Bifurcated Subject. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):415 - 434.
Similar books and articles
John Cottingham (ed.) (1998). Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Jean-Luc Marion (2007). On the Ego and on God: Further Cartesian Questions. Fordham University Press.
Mary Domski, The God of Matter, the God of Geometry: The Connection Between Descartes' Math and Metaphysics.
Stephen Voss (ed.) (1993). Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
Jean-Luc Marion (2001). The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. Fordham University Press.
Thomas C. Vinci (1998). Cartesian Truth. Oxford University Press.
Zijlstra, Christiaan Peter, The Rebirth of Descartes : The Nineteenth-Century Reinstatement of Cartesian Metaphysics in France and Germany.
Jorge Secada (2000). Cartesian Metaphysics: The Late Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #128,632 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?