Analysis 55 (4):247-251 (1995)
|Abstract||In a recent Analysis article, Quentin Smith argues that classical theism is inconsistent with certain consequences of Stephen Hawking's quantum cosmology.1 Although I am not a theist, it seems to me that Smith's argument fails to establish its conclusion. The purpose of this paper is to show what is wrong with Smith's argument. According to Smith, Hawking's cosmological theory includes what Smith calls "Hawking's wave function law." Hawking's wave function law (hereafter, "HL") apparently has, among its consequences, the following claim. (1) The unconditional probability that a universe like this one - i.e., a universe with the metric hij and matter field Φ - should begin to exist is 95%.2 Smith then argues that the theist who accepts HL must also accept that the following sentence was once true.3..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Quentin Smith (2000). Concerning the Metaphysical Necessity of the Universe Beginning Uncaused. Philo 3 (1):73-75.
Hans Halvorson (forthcoming). Theism and Physical Cosmology. In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
William Lane Craig (1993). Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford University Press.
George Nakhnikian (2000). Quantum Cosmology, Theistic Philosophical Cosmology and the Existence Question. Philo 3 (1):63-72.
Quentin Smith (1998). Why Stephen Hawking's Cosmology Precludes a Creator. Philo 1 (1):75-93.
Quentin Smith (1994). Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism. Analysis 54 (4):236-243.
Daniel Murphy (2008). Quantum Cosmology and Theism. Philo 11 (1):93-119.
Added to index2009-11-29
Total downloads58 ( #16,854 of 549,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?