David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 44 (167):46 - 56 (1969)
The central purpose of this paper is to sketch the logic of being a democrat. That is, what is involved in being a democrat will be defined and delineated. I shall proceed by first examining Richard Wollheim's alleged paradox of democratic theory. Wollheim's solution to the paradox will then be shown to be unsatisfactory. Next, the concept of being a democrat will be clarified. The stage will then be set for showing that Wollheim's alleged paradox of democratic theory dissolves upon discerning what a democrat qua democrat is committed to believe. In the process of clarifying what is involved in being a democrat and dissolving the alleged paradox of democratic theory, it will become evident that one popular argument often levelled against resistance to democratic law is without foundation. This is the argument that any democrat who conscientiously disobeys valid democratic law is necessarily behaving inconsistently with his democratic principles; and, therefore, if someone does conscientiously disobey valid democratic law, it proves he is not ‘really’ a democrat after all
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sven Ove Hansson (1993). A Resolution of Wollheim's Paradox. Dialogue 32 (04):681-.
Similar books and articles
Donald Meiklejohn (1971). Book Review:Plato: Totalitarian or Democrat? [REVIEW] Ethics 81 (2):181-.
Thomas Landon Thorson (1963). Plato: Totalitarian or Democrat? Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Lawrence J. Mannion (1941). The Irrepressible Democrat, Roger Williams. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):158-160.
Richard Mulgan (2000). Was Aristotle an “Aristotelian Social Democrat”? Ethics 111 (1):79-101.
Richard Mulgan (2000). Was Aristotle an "Aristotelian Social Democrat"? Ethics 111 (1):79-101.
Ian Shapiro (1994). Three Ways to Be a Democrat. Political Theory 22 (1):124-151.
Randy L. Friedman (2007). Traditions of Pragmatism and the Myth of the Emersonian Democrat. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (1):154-184.
Dominic Scott (2000). Plato's Critique of the Democratic Character. Phronesis 45 (1):19-37.
Dominic Scott (2000). Plato's Critique of the Democratic Character. Phronesis 45 (1):19 - 37.
A. Fives (2009). Reasonable, Agonistic, or Good?: The Character of a Democrat. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (8):961-983.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads8 ( #368,535 of 1,789,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #318,432 of 1,789,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?